![metro last light benchmark metro last light benchmark](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/38AGQB5Bsqo/mqdefault.jpg)
metrics for this test profile configuration based on 641 public results since 23 October 2016 with the latest data as of. Performance Metrics Analyze Test Configuration: Metro: Last Light Redux Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Initial commit of Metro Last Light Redux game Suites Using This Test
![metro last light benchmark metro last light benchmark](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81DMF4aWMqL._SL1500_.jpg)
METRO LAST LIGHT BENCHMARK UPDATE
Update to now use the Metro Last Light Redux FPS dumping info now that the game developers fixed their issues. *** Test profile page view reporting began March 2021. ** Data based on those opting to upload their test results to and users enabling the opt-in anonymous statistics reporting while running benchmarks from an Internet-connected platform. * Uploading of benchmark result data to is always optional (opt-in) via the Phoronix Test Suite for users wishing to share their results publicly. To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark metroll-redux. If the test appears hung you may need to manually exit the Steam client. Your Steam account must also be active and the game already installed. This test profile assumes you have the Valve Steam client already installed for your operating system / distribution and that it's installed to the standard path. We compared the new editions to the original console versions, noting some remarkable differences - not least the impressive boosts to both physical and temporal resolution.
![metro last light benchmark metro last light benchmark](https://static.tweaktown.com/content/7/7/7703_43_nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-review-hail-king-baby.png)
Last week - remastered versions of the classic Metro 2033 and Metro Last Light coming soon to Xbox One, PlayStation 4 and PC. In total we went with nine major tests covering three resolutions and three quality settings. The benchmark tool allowed us to create our own graphics quality presets. But, really, it was only about $139 dollars LESS VS the 10700k barebones combo.Īnd 10700k being faster, so why not go for the 10700k? Happy with this build overall.A Steam-based test of the Metro: Last Light Redux game. Since all my co-workers to friends telling me that with AMD 3700x at least i would be saving "ALOT" of money. I had the option to "upgrade" to a 3800x or a 3700x system. Here is a good video between HIGH VS ULTRA gaming: Also normally you don't want to always game on ULTRA settings, especially when you have a high refresh rate gaming monitor. BUT, whatever settings i either put on medium or high, my 1440p monitor makes up for it in quality. You may notice that i don't put all my games graphic settings ALL on ULTRA. Overall, the Core i7-10700K is a very good performer with its 8-cores and 16-threads in this benchmark.ġ0700k OC 5.3GHZ first two cores, rest of the cores 5.2ghz, EXCEPT, 5.1ghz on the very last coreĢ080 super Hybrid FTW3 EVGA, MEMORY: 950 CLOCK: 118Ī bit of a tough journey, because while i was building my new 10700k system, i was in the middle of moving into a new house.īut, everything ended up fine. Intel's Core i7-10700K notches a small win over the Core i7-9700K, but opens up an impressive lead over the stock Ryzen 7 3800X. The Core i7-10700K's performance earns it the 6th place. The Core i7-9700K clearly shows how significantly the high-end Coffee Lake Refresh-based CPUs fall behind the Comet Lake models. That's a ~1.4% generational speed-up in this title. Again, the Core i7-9700K tumbles down the chart, falling behind its Comet Lake-based successor. In this benchmark, the Core i7-10700K has an impressive performance, which is way ahead of the last generation Core i7-9700K by 1.4%. The Core i7-10700K takes a comfortable 4.6% lead over the Ryzen 7 3800X. It is 0% lower than the Core i7-10700KF while being 1.4% higher than the Core i7-9700KF. The Core i7-10700K sits between Core i7-10700KF and Core i7-9700KF. Overall, the Core i7-10700F is an average performer with its 8-cores and 16-threads in this benchmark. Intel's Core i7-10700F notches a small win over the Core i7-9700, but opens up an impressive lead over the stock Ryzen 7 3800X. The Core i7-10700F's performance earns it the 12th place. The Core i7-9700 clearly shows how significantly the high-end Coffee Lake Refresh-based CPUs fall behind the Comet Lake models. That's a ~0.3% generational speed-up in this title. Again, the Core i7-9700 tumbles down the chart, falling behind its Comet Lake-based successor. In this benchmark, the Core i7-10700F has an impressive performance, which is way ahead of the last generation Core i7-9700 by 0.3%. The Core i7-10700F takes a comfortable 2.1% lead over the Ryzen 7 3800X. It is 0% lower than the Core i7-10700 while being 0.3% higher than the Core i7-9700.